Why would Harriet Miers recommend taking down all the incumbent USAs. That would have been unprecedented in the middle of a term. Why did they then draw up lists of USAs to hit? Normally those matters would have been handled one person at a time. Instead they decided to bring several of them down in a group. There is only one reason for taking out a whole group at once. There is somebody you don't want to take out all by herself.
The more I read about this the more I am forced to the conclusion that this is one giant obstruction of justice case and it is focused like a laser on Carol Lam. Wilkes or Foggo was about to turn. She was getting close to taking out her second Congressman, Jerry Lewis. Duncan Hunter was not far away. From Duncan Hunter it probably isn't a big jump to somebody even bigger.
No this is the biggest scandal since Watergate. Probably the biggest since Teapot Dome. You can just smell it.
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Why The Need to Take Out A Crowd?
Posted by
Corpus Juris
at
2:51 PM
Posted by Corpus Juris at 2:51 PM
Labels: Alberto Gonzales, Carol Lam, Duncan Hunter, Harriet Miers, Jerry Lewis, US Attorney