Monday, July 23, 2007


Fletcher Official Admits Political Gagging

If you're reading this at work - on your lunch hour or break, of course! - count your blessings and do something nice for your boss.

You're better off than Kentucky state employees, who cannot read this, or any other blog that republican Governor Ernie Fletcher doesn't like, at work.

Yeah, yeah, they shouldn't be reading blogs at work, blah, blah, blah.

That's what Fletcher officials said. AFTER they got caught blocking a particular blogger who was exposing their crimes and stupidity several times a day.

For 2-1/2 years, from his inauguration in December 2003, Ernie had no problem with state employees reading blogs at work. State computer techs blocked porn sites, of course, and if your blog reading interferred with your work, your boss would call you in for a little chat about productivity, but if you wanted to spend your break reading the latest on Daily Kos or Little Green Footballs, nobody cared much.

But in May 2006, a grand jury indicted Fletcher on charges of violating state merit law by firing civil-service-protected Democrats to make room for his republican cronies.

And Mark Nickolas attacked.

Nickolas, who managed the campaign of Ben Chandler, who lost the governor's race to Fletcher, operated a blog called BluegrassReport.org. For two years, he'd been posting news and snarky commentary about Fletcher's Keystone Kops administration - along with strong criticism of the state's cowardly and incompetent Democrats.

But after the indictment, Nickolas moved into overdrive, and BluegrassReport became the don't-miss, refresh-all-day, multi-commented Blog Everybody Reads.

And Fletcher couldn't take it. One day, state employees checked out BluegrassReport.org and found only a full-page message: "This Site Has Been Blocked by the Commonwealth Office of Technology."

WTF?

That first day, you could still get on Kos, and LGF, and TPM, and Drudge, and all the rest.

So by lunchtime, it was pretty obvious what had happened. Fletcher had specifically blocked BGR because Nickolas - and his many bright, funny, well-informed commenters - hurt his tiny widdle feewings.

Emails flew between Nickolas and his state employee informers, and by close of business, Nickolas was accusing Fletcher of targeting BGR in political retribution.

The next day, all the liberal/progressive blogs were blocked, but state employees could still spend all day soaking up the vomit spewed by LGF and Drudge and the rest of the bush-fellators.

Nickolas cried foul again: Republican blogs were fine, but Democrats and liberals need not apply.

Fletcher officials blustered and lied and stalled, but in the end, they had no choice. To cover up their un-Constitutional gagging of BGR from state computers, they had to block all blogs.

Elephant-footed, they blanket-blocked everything on the Internet, to the point that people who needed information couldn't access even federal government websites.

Over the course of months, COT refined its blocking techniques, lifting the block on specific web sites if an employee could justify it as work-related.

It's still highly suspicious: FOX gets a pass, despite being news-free, as do Amazon and most shopping sites. Right-wing and Christian religious sites get through, but the Flying Spaghetti Monster is blocked.

It's also somewhat arbitrary: Talking Points Memo, TPM Cafe, TPM Election Central and TPM Horse's Mouth are blocked, but TPMMuckraker is not. Salon's War Room blog is blocked, but its Broadsheet blog is not. Kevin Drum's Political Animal blog at washingtonmonthly.com hung on for a few months, but was gone by the end of the year.

Meanwhile, Nickolas filed a federal First Amendment lawsuit against Fletcher and kept beating Ernie senseless on his blog.

In June, Nickolas moved to Montana and shut down BGR. But the lawsuit continues, and last Friday former Fletcher technology commissioner Michael Inman dropped a bombshell:

Robbie Rudolph, Fletcher's running mate for lieutenant governor and secretary of the executive cabinet, directly ordered Inman to block BGR.

"It was apparent that the state had intentionally targeted BluegrassReport.org and had blocked the category of blogs and other categories of Web sites in an attempt to disguise that fact," Inman said in a sworn statement.

No shit.

The Blocking of BGR is small potatoes compared to the wholesale burning of the U.S. Constitution perpetrated by Smirky and Darth Cheney. But the testimony of Inman - whom Fletcher stupidly fired - is a crack in the Right-Wing Authoritarian Wall.

It gives me hope on two counts: That republicans with integrity are not a myth, and that they will, when pushed hard enough toward the Dark Side, do the Right Thing. And that blogs like BGR and Watching Those We Chose can, indeed, Make A Difference.

Mark Nickolas and BluegrassReport contributed enormously to the 2006-2007 rebirth of the Kentucky Democratic Party, not least by flaying moribund and corrupt Democrats as raw as he flayed Fletcher and other republicans. Nickolas and BGR strongly supported Steve Beshear's gubernatorial candidacy and played a significant role in Beshear's 20-point drubbing of Fake Democrat and Convicted Criminal Bruce Lunsford in the May primary.

The new chair of the Kentucky Democratic Party is State Treasurer Jonathan Miller, who staunchly opposed Fletcher's Internet blocking. Miller was the Voice of Reason, pointing out that Indiana, Ohio, Illinois and other neighboring states manage to get the work of the people done without denying their employees access to anything on the Internet except porn.

Miller's withdrawal from the governor's race ensured Beshear's victory, so Steve owes him big time.

If Beshear wins the election in November, state employees will be able to read political blogs at work again by Christmas.

BGR is gone, but several other progressive Kentucky blogs are working hard to fill its shoes, including Bluegrass Roots, Kentucky Democrat, Drinking Liberally Louisville, Hillbilly Report, Kentucky Woman and Ditch Mitch Kentucky.




There's more: "Fletcher Official Admits Political Gagging" >>

Saturday, July 21, 2007


Converging Media--Video and Web Based Political Punditry

This morning Larry Johnson's No Quarter has a comment entitled War On Hillary discussing Eric Edelman's absurd letter to Hillary Clinton accusing her of giving aid and comfort to the "enemy." In Edelman's fevered brain it is treason for a United States Senator, who happens to be a leading candidate for President, to merely ask if the DoD has made any contingency plans for pulling troops out of Iraq. It is a great post, made better by Larry's insertion of a Keith Olbermann Special Comment on the same subject. Give his post a read, then watch the video. Olbermann, as always, is passionate and right on target.

I don't know where it started, maybe with the women at Firedoglake, but more and more often, all across the web, short video clips are being combined with traditional political commentary. Most of the smaller blogs rely on YouTube for their clips. Some of the larger sites create their own, but don't seem to be afraid to embed YouTube clips when available. Nearly everybody gives appropriate attribution and rarely are the clips more than a couple of minutes long. The shorter the better. Like YouTube, ComedyCentral puts some limitations on the use of their clips, but both the YouTube and ComedyCentral limitations are reasonable and not hard for most political bloggers to meet. It would seem that combining video with punditry is a win-win for everybody.

There is resistance to combining video with traditional written punditry. I think Kevin Drum would admit that he is just not much of a video person. Except for still pictures of a few cats, you are not likely see anything but the written word at The Washington Monthly. Video is so, so Huffington Post or, increasingly, Talking Points Memo.

Most of the writers here at WTWC are Political Animal alumni. They love Kevin's work. Some of our writers are professional journalists writing what they believe, not what they have been assigned. Like Kevin Drum, himself a professional journalist, they have a passion for the written word and like Drum, they are purists. They rarely include photographs, let alone videos, with their comments.

Combining video with written commentary is a technique I have been using for the last few months. For example, on Thursday I wrote Pentagon Simulations Suggest Al Qaeda Take Over Of Iraq Unlikely If United States Withdraws which includes a link to a long Washington Post story by Karen DeYoung and Thomas E. Ricks, and a video clip of a Ricks interview. While most of my posts don't include video, where possible I try to link to a short clip. The clips are usually intended to reinforce what I have written.

I am convinced mixed media is the future of web based political punditry. Neither WTWC, nor The Washington Monthly is a literary journal. Everyone who blogs on politics, from the legendary Juan Cole, through the powerful Larry Johnson and on down to local upstart Todd Elkins are in the business of getting their story out in the most powerful way available. Mixing video with the written word can be very powerful. It combines the best of newspaper and television.

In a future comment I am going to talk more about why I believe it is becoming increasingly important for Congressmen and other news makers to include short video clips with traditional press release materials. I am convinced that Democrats, who often complain they thwarted by the handful of gatekeepers in the MSM, can cheaply take their message directly to an important target audience--you and me.




There's more: "Converging Media--Video and Web Based Political Punditry" >>