Wednesday, December 12, 2007


More muck on Huck

His 1992 words keep coming back to haunt him. Associated Press:

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The U.S. shouldn't try to kill Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Mike Huckabee declared when he first ran for office. No women in combat anywhere. No gays in the military. No contributions in politics to candidates more than a year before an election.
His statements are among 229 answers Huckabee offered as a 36-year-old Texarkana pastor during his first run for political office in 1992. In that unsuccessful race against Sen. Dale Bumpers, Huckabee offered himself as a social conservative and listed "moral decay" as one of the top problems facing the country.
Daily Kos exposed his views on women -- wives should submit to their husbands, so sayeth the Huckster:
In August of 1998, Huckabee was one of 131 signatories to a full page USA Today Ad which declared: "I affirm the statement on the family issued by the 1998 Southern Baptist Convention." What was in the family statement from the SBC? "A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ."
But more details from the 1992 questionnaire should raise some eyebrows of moderate voters and lead people to question his flip-flops on PACs and taxes.

[Keep reading...]

Huck called for...
...the elimination of political action committees and campaign contributions from lobbyists. He also said candidates should not be allowed to receive contributions until one year before an election and said there should be limits on the amount of out-of-state money they could accept.
As Arkansas governor, Huckabee formed a political action committee based in Virginia to raise money for non-federal candidates that allowed him to travel and raise his profile for a potential presidential run. The Hope for America PAC shut down earlier this year as Huckabee entered the White House race.
_ Said he would not support any tax increases if elected to the Senate. Huckabee's record of raising some taxes as Arkansas' governor has drawn fire from fiscal conservatives in the presidential race.
_ When asked whether the U.S. should take any action to kill Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, Huckabee replied: "The U.S. should not kill Saddam Hussein or anyone else." The U.S. military captured Saddam, an Iraqi court convicted him and he was hanged last December.
_ Rejected the idea of women in combat "because of my strong traditional view that women should be treated with respect and dignity and not subject to the kinds of abuses that could occur in combat."
_ Said living together out of wedlock "is demeaning to the highest expression of human love and commitment. I reject it as an alternate lifestyle, because it robs people of the highest possible relationship one can experience: marriage."
_ Said he believed no one has a constitutional right to an abortion and supported requiring minors to obtain parental consent. Huckabee also said he supported requiring doctors to discuss abortion alternatives and a waiting period.
Huckabee's vocal opposition to gay marriage and abortion have attracted evangelical Christians' support and vaulted him to the top of the field in Iowa.
But some of his earlier comments offer a harder-edged presentation of those stances than he has presented as he's tried to portray himself as a conservative who won't "scare the living daylights" out of moderates and independents.
God luck with that. There's more at the AP link -- his opposition to legislation that would "give workers time off to care for an ailing family member." He unsurprisingly supported Clarence Thomas. And he described the federal welfare system as "disgraceful." All standard fare for conservative hard-liners.

But watch out. He's learning to temper his extreme ideas by "successfully using language that expresses views without being hard-edged," said Jay Barth, political scientist from Hendrix College.




There's more: "More muck on Huck" >>

Sunday, December 9, 2007


The Wurlitzer Prize for Wingnuttery for the Week Ending December 8, 2007

Some weeks, it isn't who will get the Wurlitzer, but why?

This is one of those weeks, and the recipient is none other than the original organ grinders monkey, Bill O'Rielly.

But which bit of wingnutty goodness that spewed forth from the fetid maw of the foam-flecked madman should be the perfect example? Every week in the all-spin zone brings Bill O that much closer to generating his own gravitational field.

Last week he not only called you - yes you - a satanist, but the day before that he declared that, all by himself, he had defeated the "forces of darkness" and *won* the imaginary "War on Christmas" - the fantastic, existential struggle that existed only in the dank recesses of his own fever-swamp of a defective noggin.

On the December 5 episode of his show, he announced that he single-handedly won the War on Christmas. "There's a very effective movement under way to wipe out in the public square all vestiges of Christmas. Stores were ordering employees not to say "Merry Christmas." If I had not done the campaign, then the forces of darkness would have won." (Jeez Bill, I thought you were the forces of darkness. But what the hell? Let me be the first to wish you a Happy Hanukkah, a Blessed Eid and Kwanzaa Greetings, you jingoistic old xenophobe you!)

But he wasn't done! The very next day, he called you - yes you - a Devil Worshiper. What, you may wonder, did you do to deserve that slander against your good (insert belief system here, if applicable) name?

You are here, Dear Reader, and Bill O says that readers of progressive blogs are Devil Worshipers. He tried to play it off..."That was a little satire there…don’t get too upset about it.” But he just couldn't help himself...he had to add “I still think they are satanists.”

The Wurlitzer struggled mightily - should Bill O get the Wurlitzer for being delusional? Or for being paranoid? Unable to narrow it down, the Mighty Wurlitzer has decided to bundle the pathologies into a single diagnosis, and bestow our dubious honor on Bill O'Reilly for being a perfect textbook specimen of delusional, paranoid wingnuttery.




There's more: "The Wurlitzer Prize for Wingnuttery for the Week Ending December 8, 2007" >>

Monday, July 16, 2007


Cindy Sheehan cut-off symbolizes all that’s wrong with Daily Kos as a site and Markos as a person

Note: This blogger was booted from Kos more than a year ago, for the reasons of: pointing out (along with others) Kos’ good friend Armando’s corporate legal clients of the right wing of corporate America; talking too much (maybe at all) about the Green Party; and generally being too independent-minded.

Anyway, as long as “Der Kossenfuehrer” picks only Democratic winners, not people with ideas, and wants to maintain control of the website that way, contrary to “Kossacks’” blind claims that it’s “their” website by his grace, things like the “censorship” of Cindy Sheehan, as long as she is determined to oppose Nancy “Eva Braun” Pelosi, will remain problematic.

Kos has had plenty of Democrats, or staff members, right regular diaries, so it’s not a thing about politicians. And, I know it isn’t censorship, as it’s a private site; hence, the “censorship” in scare quotes.

Nonetheless …

OK, now that I’ve rolled out that little hand grenade, let the fur fly.




There's more: "Cindy Sheehan cut-off symbolizes all that’s wrong with Daily Kos as a site and Markos as a person" >>